[Novalug] Ext4 != Ext4. Is XFS == XFS?

James Ewing Cottrell, III jecottrell3@comcast.net
Fri Dec 9 14:04:27 EST 2016

OK, so I mean Backwards Compatible. Boot RHEL 7. Mkfs.ext4. Now try an read that with RHEL 6. Now make another ext4 and try and read it with RHEL5. Doesn't work.

In other words ext4 != ext4.

My question is...am I going to run into this with XFS?

> On December 9, 2016 at 1:24 PM Peter Larsen via Novalug <novalug@firemountain.net> wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 11:53 AM, James Ewing Cottrell III via Novalug wrote:
> > OK, obviously I've go some 'Splainin' to do...
> >
> > What I mean is, if I create an ext4 fs with RHEL6, I can't read it
> > with RHEL6; nor can I read a RHEL6 ext4 fs with RHEL5. The reason is
> > that newer systems use newer features, which are unknown to older
> > systems.
> James, would you like to explain a bit further? I quite often use EXT4
> to format USB drives (who needs vfat when everything you have is Linux)
> and I've NEVER had a problem moving between releases, Fedora/RHEL etc.
> when it comes to the same file system. Do know, that ext4 was TP in RHEL
> 5, not fully supported until 5.6 but beyond that you should have no
> issues moving between RHEL5,6,7 using ext4. 
> Also, and this may sound a bit like an off the cuff remark, but I have
> to ask: Are you sure your RHEL7 is using ext4? The default is xfs.
> >
> > In other words, it's not Upward Compatible.
> Ehhh, it is - upwards it is. Backwards can be tough if you have very
> very VERY large file systems (like 16+ TB).  Or at least it would be
> nice to see an example of this.
> -- 
> Regards
>   Peter Larsen
> **********************************************************************
> The Novalug mailing list is hosted by firemountain.net.
> To unsubscribe or change delivery options:
> http://www.firemountain.net/mailman/listinfo/novalug

More information about the Novalug mailing list