[Novalug] where did desktops come from?
Bryan J Smith
b.j.smith@ieee.org
Thu Dec 31 14:51:22 EST 2015
I do try to provide links to Wikipedia articles, which then has yet more
links to other, research level references.
I also try to define most acronyms.
But on the flip side, I often get labeled as "talking down" to "the
experienced" when I post even more, longer detail.
In other words, there is no such thing as an "universal" response.
I was reminded of this many years ago when a critic of mine had a Samba
issue. I posted a detailed response, assuming he knew nothing, and not
only solved his immediate problem, but 3 follow-up issues he ran into.
>From that point on, when ever someone complained about my detail, or how I
treated them as "knowing nothing," he defended me. Because he had been
there, a very experienced guy, but literally over his head in Samba, and
appreciated me assuming nothing.
It's a difficult balance. It clearly takes me time to respond, so I try to
be brief. At the same time, when I'm not, it pisses a number of people off
who go, "I already know this, get to the meat!"
Summaries and references only go so far.
-- bjs
DISCLAIMER: Sent from phone, please excuse any typos
--
Bryan J Smith - Technology Mercenary
b.j.smith@ieee.org - http://linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
On Dec 31, 2015 3:39 PM, "Walt Smith via Novalug" <novalug@firemountain.net>
wrote:
>
>
> Actually, I agree with Gary knots question.
> I remember when desktops magincally appeared in
> news summaries and distros. Like X, you had to follow details
> from the beginning.
>
> Now, to be honest, I havent' tried digging in with literature,
> for myself, for this particular topic, and I'm also interested to
> some small degree. But not enough to ask for others
> tiem and labor at this time. I think finding the right concise info may
> not be
> straight forward unless one purchases "just the right"
> reference.
>
> For example, many of the attempts on this list by extremely
> well versed people are often self referencing, or assume meaning
> to some buzzwords. For example, an assumption might be made when
> XFree86 is mentioned, that someone would auotmatically know
> it is an X-server ( or rather, client - since in X, some people see the
> server/client
> relationship as reversed... while technically not, it's very difficult for
> a novice
> to understand !! )). i.e. Names like APT, yum, rpm are certainly not
> self-descriptive.
> ( and not identical in function ). And really, I got tired of keeping up
> with buzznames
> that magically appear in, say, slashdot, without so much as a quick turn of
> a phrase.
>
> The intentions are certainly here on novalug, and energy fed, but
> sometimes perspective
> is a daunting challenge.
>
>
> Walt..
>
>
> ----
> The government is lawless, not the press (people).
> ( [Supreme Court] Justice Douglas re: The Pentagon Papers )
> **********************************************************************
> The Novalug mailing list is hosted by firemountain.net.
>
> To unsubscribe or change delivery options:
> http://www.firemountain.net/mailman/listinfo/novalug
>
More information about the Novalug
mailing list