[Novalug] small, tight lower overhead footprint?
Walt Smith
waltechmail@yahoo.com
Wed Oct 17 22:32:20 EDT 2012
Based on the requirements,
I don't see how anyone could say anything
other than C or C++ optimized.
Ease of programming wasn't a requirement.
Walt........
On 10/17/2012 07:06 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> which language would you choose if you were interested in string
> manipulation, XML output, low system overhead, small memory footprint,
> and speedy responses. compatibility with other linux systems is a plus.
>
> perl? C? python? TCL? another? any information that goes along with
> your advice would be appreciated.
--
More information about the Novalug
mailing list