[Novalug] small, tight lower overhead footprint?

Walt Smith waltechmail@yahoo.com
Wed Oct 17 22:32:20 EDT 2012


Based on the requirements,
I don't see how anyone could say anything 
other than C or C++ optimized.

Ease of programming wasn't a requirement.

Walt........



On 10/17/2012 07:06 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> which language would you choose if you were interested in string
> manipulation, XML output, low system overhead, small memory footprint,
> and speedy responses.  compatibility with other linux systems is a plus.
>
> perl? C? python? TCL? another?  any information that goes along with
> your advice would be appreciated.

--



More information about the Novalug mailing list